<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DN Media Corporation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dnmedia.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dnmedia.com</link>
	<description>Domain Name Investing &#38; Web Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:39:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>DomainInvestShop.com Spam / Appraisal Scam</title>
		<link>http://dnmedia.com/domaininvestshop-com-scamspam/</link>
		<comments>http://dnmedia.com/domaininvestshop-com-scamspam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sumner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DomainInvestShop.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purchase inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dnmedia.com/?p=413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have been contacted several times over the past week from domain owners who have received spam domain purchase inquiries from Jerad Martensen of DomainInvestShop.com.  The confusion lies in the fact that he is forwarding his domain name to ours.  It is a scam, he has no affiliation with our company, and I would strongly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been contacted several times over the past week from domain owners who have received spam domain purchase inquiries from Jerad Martensen of DomainInvestShop.com.  The confusion lies in the fact that he is forwarding his domain name to ours.  It is a scam, he has no affiliation with our company, and I would strongly advise you not to do business with this individual.</p>
<p>An email that was forwarded to us from a concerned party looks like this:</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Hello,</p>
<p>We are going to purchase your domain name.</p>
<p>Our company is in hosting and domain name business.</p>
<p>Please email us your desired price in USD or euros for the domain name in the subject line.</p>
<p>If you have other names for sale please email us your domains with prices.</p>
<p>Looking forward to doing business with you.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Jerad Martensen</p>
<p>CEO</p>
<p>Domain Investing Inc<br />
Domain Name Investing &amp; Web Development</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>The email comes from <a href="mailto:martensen@domaininvestshop.com">martensen@domaininvestshop.com</a>.</p>
<p>Avoid this idiot like the plague.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Update</span>: We were able to stop this individual from forwarding their domain to us for the time being using htaccess.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Another Update</span>: Apparently this is an appraisal scam.  Don&#8217;t pay for an appraisal from this individual.</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=DN%20Media%20Corporation&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2F&amp;linkname=DomainInvestShop.com%20Spam%20%2F%20Appraisal%20Scam&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2Fdomaininvestshop-com-scamspam%2F"><img src="http://dnmedia.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dnmedia.com/domaininvestshop-com-scamspam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting Google Trend</title>
		<link>http://dnmedia.com/interesting-google-trend-mini-sites-vs-domain-parking/</link>
		<comments>http://dnmedia.com/interesting-google-trend-mini-sites-vs-domain-parking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 01:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sumner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dnmedia.com/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was playing around with Google Insights for Search tonight and noticed an interesting trend.  &#8220;Domain Parking&#8221; went from a high of 92 in July of 2007 to its current low of 39 in December 2009.  A few months after PPC revenue started to head south, interest in the term &#8220;Mini Sites&#8221; started [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was playing around with Google Insights for Search tonight and noticed an interesting trend.  &#8220;Domain Parking&#8221; went<span id="more-395"></span> from a high of 92 in July of 2007 to its current low of 39 in December 2009.  A few months after PPC revenue started to head south, interest in the term &#8220;Mini Sites&#8221; started climbing from a low of 47 in September of 2007 to 77 in December 2009&#8230; almost double that of &#8220;Domain Parking&#8221;.  The paths crossed for the last time in February of 2009, and in March &#8220;Mini Sites&#8221; took the lead again and held it, coincidentally the same month we launched <a href="http://minisites.com" target="_blank">MiniSites.com</a>.  Guess we timed that just right <img src='http://dnmedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As you can see from the graph, when mini sites are doing well parking isn&#8217;t, and vice versa.  I think <a href="http://symbolics.com/ppc-thoughts-a-few-short-thoughts-for-today/" target="_blank">Aron Meystedt&#8217;s prediction</a> that &#8220;you’ll soon see that parking companies will offer more development services to supplement their parking business&#8221; is right on the money.  When their parking arm is floundering, their mini site development arm will flourish, and will result in a much more steady flow of revenue.  Parked.com already started the trend with the acquisition of WhyPark, we&#8217;ll see who follows suit.</p>
<p><script src="http://www.gmodules.com/ig/ifr?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fig%2Fmodules%2Fgoogle_insightsforsearch_interestovertime_searchterms.xml&amp;up__property=empty&amp;up__search_terms=mini+sites%7C+domain+parking&amp;up__location=empty&amp;up__category=0&amp;up__time_range=empty&amp;up__compare_to_category=false&amp;synd=ig&amp;w=600&amp;h=350&amp;lang=en-US&amp;title=Google+Insights+for+Search&amp;border=%23ffffff%7C3px%2C1px+solid+%23999999&amp;output=js" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=DN%20Media%20Corporation&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2F&amp;linkname=Interesting%20Google%20Trend&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2Finteresting-google-trend-mini-sites-vs-domain-parking%2F"><img src="http://dnmedia.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dnmedia.com/interesting-google-trend-mini-sites-vs-domain-parking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Selling Ad Space</title>
		<link>http://dnmedia.com/selling-ad-space/</link>
		<comments>http://dnmedia.com/selling-ad-space/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sumner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dnmedia.com/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past few weeks I have been contacted by several upstart and established domain industry bloggers to advertise MiniSites.com on their site.  The prices ranged from $x to high $xxx per month.  This got me thinking&#8230; how are they coming up with these prices?  I have a feeling that several are taking what they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past few weeks I have been contacted by several upstart and established domain industry bloggers to<span id="more-382"></span> advertise MiniSites.com on their site.  The prices ranged from $x to high $xxx per month.  This got me thinking&#8230; how are they coming up with these prices?  I have a feeling that several are taking what they would like to earn from their site, and dividing it by the number of positions they have available, and hoping for the best.  Others may be trying to price it at the most they think I can afford to pay.  None of their pitches were effective though, and I&#8217;ll tell you why.</p>
<h3>Target Market</h3>
<p>Before you tell me how many uniques, visitors, and page views you get, tell me a little about your site and your visitors.  What do you typically write about?  What type of visitor do your articles attract?  If you get 50k uniques a month, but they aren&#8217;t my target market, I couldn&#8217;t care less.  Get a little bit more creative than &#8220;My site is a blog about the domain industry, and it is read by domainers.&#8221;  In our case, we are looking for intermediate to advanced domainers with quality portfolios.</p>
<p>For example, if I were trying to sell ad space to Bido on PushToAuction.com, I would tell Sahar or Jarred how my visitors are very targeted to active domain sellers looking to start an auction on Sedo, and advertising on my site would present an opportunity to take business away from them.  Also, my site attracts a lot of domain buyers looking for low-cost domains starting at $60.  Since his starting price is $28, PushToAuction.com could send him a lot of active bidders as well.  This would probably get their attention.</p>
<p>Look at my site, see what I&#8217;m selling, what my prices are, etc.  If you have a site that teaches newbies on a shoestring budget how to hand register domains, are your visitors going to buy our mini sites?  Probably not, it is most likely too expensive of an investment.  If you write a lot of articles about WordPress and how to build your own mini sites, are your visitors going to buy our product?  Probably not, the DIY crowd that has some level of technical knowledge would rarely pay someone to do it for them.  If you write about how mini sites do not work&#8230; well that should be a no-brainer.  If your visitors won&#8217;t convert for me, they are worth $0.</p>
<p>If you start your email by broaching this subject, you&#8217;ve got my attention.  You added a personal touch, and took the time to show me that you understand what my needs are, and that you can deliver.  If I feel like I&#8217;m one of 20 people that was BCC&#8217;ed on your email, I&#8217;m less likely to continue reading.</p>
<h3>Site Analytics</h3>
<p>Ok, I&#8217;m still reading your email, so the next important question is how much traffic you are getting.  Be prepared to show me screen shots of your analytics, and not just from the current month.  Unless you are a big name domainer, don&#8217;t expect me to trust stats that you type into the email&#8230; I want screen shots or a PDF.  Don&#8217;t make me ask for it, or I&#8217;ll just assume it isn&#8217;t good news and move on.</p>
<p>I want to see that you not only have traffic this month, but that you have had traffic consistently over a reasonable period of time.  I don&#8217;t care if you had 10k uniques this month when you had 1k uniques last month, and 2k uniques the month before that.  I want to know that while I am advertising on your blog, you are going to continue making new posts and driving consistent traffic so my ad gets the expected number of impressions.  If you don&#8217;t get consistent traffic, don&#8217;t base your price on your highest month.</p>
<p>If you just launched your site a month ago, either price yourself very low, or don&#8217;t ask me for a long commitment.  I&#8217;m not going to pay for 4 months in advance when you only have one month of traffic to back it up.  How do I know you&#8217;re going to keep posting next month, unless I&#8217;ve seen you posting month, after month, after month?  I don&#8217;t, so I&#8217;m not going to make a long-term commitment, and I&#8217;m probably not going to buy at all unless you&#8217;re not asking for much.</p>
<p>Also, I want to know your bounce rate and the average time on site.  Why?  Because if you&#8217;re getting 10k uniques a month, and 80% click away in less than 5 seconds, is my ad getting seen?  Not by as many as it sounds like.  Page views don&#8217;t tell you much if half of them are coming from 5% of your readers, and almost everyone else is bouncing.  I would also like to know how many new visitors you are getting each month.  This isn&#8217;t important for getting me to advertise, but it is very important for getting me to sign a long commitment.  If you are attracting a lot of new visitors every month, I&#8217;m going to keep advertising with you month after month.</p>
<p>If your analytics or ad serving software does not give you data about outbound clicks, get a new one.  Use Google Ad Manager, it will tell you this data for each ad spot you have available.  If you can tell me not only how many impressions I can expect, but also how many clicks, you have my undivided attention.</p>
<h3>Pricing</h3>
<p>This is without a doubt the most important part of the whole pitch, because all the information you provide above is what justifies the price.  If I&#8217;m still on the hook at this point, you&#8217;ll lose me quickly by asking for an absurd price.  But how do you determine what I might be willing to pay?</p>
<p>First, find out where I already advertise on domain industry sites.  Email those site owners insinuating that you might want to advertise on their blog, ask for their rates, traffic stats, and try to determine their audience on your own.  Some have an advertising page with prices and analytics, use that when available.  If they say they don&#8217;t have any slots, still ask for the info saying you might be willing to get on a waiting list if the numbers make sense.  Let&#8217;s say I advertise on XYZ.com which gets comparable traffic to your site, and has a similar audience.  It is a fair assumption that for the same price, I would be willing to advertise on your site.  I would not be willing to pay double that, so don&#8217;t ask.  If you have higher traffic, or a more targeted audience, or a better reputation, I&#8217;d probably be willing to pay more.</p>
<p>Second, find out what my alternatives are.  Especially if I contacted you, I am probably contacting other blog owners.  Do the same thing as above on sites I am not advertising on.  If a competing site has more traffic than you, a better audience, and is asking $150/month, do you think I&#8217;m going to pay you $300/month when I could just go to the other site?  If you already know what the other sites are asking, you can price yourself accordingly and earn my business.  Although you may not realize it, other domain bloggers are your competitors when it comes to selling ad space.  Find out what it takes to beat them.</p>
<p>Finally, see if I am advertising in Adwords.  In this case, I am not, because we already rank #1 in organic results for our important terms.  Let&#8217;s pretend for a second that I am advertising in Adwords though.  Why does this matter?  Because you can find out, with pretty good accuracy, what a visitor is worth to me.  Get started by going to Google and searching for a keyword phrase that I would be likely to bid on&#8230; let&#8217;s say &#8220;mini sites&#8221; without quotes.  Note what position I show up in for the sponsored search results (since I&#8217;m not there, let&#8217;s pretend I&#8217;m #1).</p>
<p>Most people get CPC (cost per click) data from <a href="https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal" target="_blank">GAKT</a> (Google Adwords Keyword Tool), but this isn&#8217;t precise enough for what you are about to do.  Behold, the little-known, but extremely useful <a href="https://adwords.google.com/select/TrafficEstimatorSandbox" target="_blank">GATES</a> (Google Adwords Traffic Estimator Sandbox).  In part 1. you enter in a keyword phrase with quotes around it (i.e. &#8211; &#8220;mini sites&#8221;) to get the exact-match data.  In part 4c. you select &#8220;All Countries and Territories&#8221; because it is a term that isn&#8217;t really specific to one country, and click Add.  Click continue.</p>
<p>On the next screen, you will see some very useful data.  To be in spots 1-3 in Google&#8217;s sponsored search results, I would need to be bidding between $0.54 and $0.75 per click.  Because I&#8217;m in the #1 position (in our pretend scenario), I&#8217;m likely paying in the upper part of that range, somewhere in the neighborhood of $0.68 to $0.75 per visitor.  What does that mean for you?  Let&#8217;s say you&#8217;re a very savvy developer that used Google Ad Manager, and you know how many clicks each of your ads get&#8230; for the sake of argument the slot you&#8217;re trying to sell me gets 200 clicks a month on average.  That slot would likely be worth between $136 and $150 per month to me (0.68 * 200 and 0.75 * 200).  If you don&#8217;t know how many clicks your ads get, try asking someone that already advertises with you how many clicks they got&#8230; they&#8217;ll be happy to tell you (either because they were disappointed, or elated).</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say for a minute that I am in the Google sponsored results, but in the #5 position.  What do you do now?  On the GATES tool that you were just looking at, play around with the Max CPC until the &#8220;Estimated Ad Positions&#8221; has 5 in the range.  In the &#8220;mini sites&#8221; example, you would have to decrease the Max CPC all the way down to $0.26 to get the Estimated Ad Positions to be 4-6, and the Estimated Avg. CPC at that point is between $0.12 and $0.26.  Because 5 is in the middle of the range of positions, I&#8217;m probably paying somewhere in the middle of the CPC range, maybe $0.19 per click.  Multiply that by the 200 clicks your ad slot generates per month, and I might be willing to pay about $38/month for your ad spot.  That may not actually be true though, which is why it&#8217;s important to also see what blogs I&#8217;m advertising on, and how much that costs me.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>When approaching someone to sell them ad space, or when you get approached, do your homework.  Try to determine who they would likely be targeting, and if your site can deliver those visitors.  Present thorough statistics for several months, maybe 6 to 12.  Finally, do some leg work to try to figure out what they would likely be willing to pay for your ad space based on your competitors rates, and their Adwords spend.  All ad buyers might not be this demanding, but even if they aren&#8217;t, it will be harder to reject your pitch when you have priced your ad slot fairly, and justified the price with analytics and information about your audience.  Do yourself a favor and use software to serve your ads, it will give you extremely valuable data on the number of impressions and clicks which will help you back up your price.</p>
<p>Selling ad space isn&#8217;t like selling a domain name.  You&#8217;re not trying to extract as much as possible out of the buyer.  You&#8217;re trying to offer them a fair price and a good value, so they can justify buying from you month after month.  If you get greedy and charge 2x what your ad space is worth because you think you can get away with it, even if you sell it for one month, I guarantee they won&#8217;t be back the next month.  Would you rather have $300 once, or $150 a month for a year or more?  Eventually you&#8217;re going to run out of people willing to overpay, and your sponsors section will be empty.  Look to build long-term relationships.</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=DN%20Media%20Corporation&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2F&amp;linkname=Selling%20Ad%20Space&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2Fselling-ad-space%2F"><img src="http://dnmedia.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dnmedia.com/selling-ad-space/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding Search Volume</title>
		<link>http://dnmedia.com/understanding-search-volume/</link>
		<comments>http://dnmedia.com/understanding-search-volume/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sumner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Investing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dnmedia.com/?p=355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every day you see sales pitches for domain names that include exact match search volume, but how many of you know how to use that number effectively in your purchase decision?  Many domainers subscribe to the &#8220;more is better&#8221; philosophy, while others prefer going after less competitive niche markets and shoot for monthly search volume [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every day you see sales pitches for domain names that include exact match search volume, but how many of you know how to<span id="more-355"></span> use that number effectively in your purchase decision?  Many domainers subscribe to the &#8220;more is better&#8221; philosophy, while others prefer going after less competitive niche markets and shoot for monthly search volume in the 2k &#8211; 6k range.  Some just use it as a guide to estimate type-in traffic, although I&#8217;m not aware of a generally agreed-upon multiplier (I usually use 0.02).  But what does this valuable piece of data really mean when it comes to organic search traffic?</p>
<p>Back in 2006 there was a tremendous amount of AOL search data that was leaked, it included information on slightly more than 9 million searches and almost 5 million clicks.  A member of EarnersForum.com, Breakpoint, scrubbed the data to determine how many clicks each position can expect to receive.  This is fairly well-known in the SEO community, but I haven&#8217;t heard domainers talking about it, hence why I wrote this post.</p>
<p>To begin analyzing search volume, we first need to know what percentage of searches will likely result in a click.  Obviously this will vary, but because this is such a large and broad sample, we can assume the data will apply fairly reliably across multiple verticals.  So lets get started&#8230;</p>
<p>The AOL search data included 9,038,794 searches which resulted in 4,926,623 clicks.  From that we can assume that 54.5% of searches will actually result in clicks.  If the exact monthly search volume for the keywords in your domain is 25,000, you can probably expect there to be 13,625 clicks (25,000 * 0.545) on the organic search results across all positions.  The next important question is how those clicks are distributed across the positions.  Obviously a site ranking #1 in Google will get more clicks than a site ranking #7, but how much more?</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Here&#8217;s the breakdown of the 4,926,623 clicks:</span></p>
<p><strong>Position 1:</strong> 2,075,765 clicks (42.13% of clicks)<br />
<strong>Position 2:</strong> 586,100 clicks (11.9% of clicks)<br />
<strong>Position 3:</strong> 418,643 clicks (8.5% of clicks)<br />
<strong>Position 4:</strong> 298,532 clicks (6.1% of clicks)<br />
<strong>Position 5:</strong> 242,169 clicks (4.92% of clicks)<br />
<strong>Position 6:</strong> 199,541 clicks (4.05% of clicks)<br />
<strong>Position 7:</strong> 168,080 clicks (3.41% of clicks)<br />
<strong>Position 8:</strong> 148,489 clicks (3.01% of clicks)<br />
<strong>Position 9:</strong> 140,356 clicks (2.85% of clicks)<br />
<strong>Position 10:</strong> 147,551 clicks (2.99% of clicks)</p>
<p>Positions 11 and beyond had 501,397 total clicks combined, or 10.18%.  That means ranking #2 would be better than having every position from 11 and on to yourself.  I find it interesting that ranking #1 gets you 3.5 times more clicks than #2, and ranking #10 is better than ranking #9 since it is the last thing someone sees before clicking to the next page of results.</p>
<p><strong>TRAFFIC </strong><img class="tex" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/7/1/c/71c9ff25f0c09814847f7b68f43f55ef.png" alt="\approx \!\," /><strong> (EXACT SEARCH VOLUME  *  0.545)  *  PERCENT OF CLICKS AS DECIMAL</strong></p>
<p>Lets go back to the example where the exact match search volume in Google is 25,000 per month, from which you could expect around 13,625 total clicks across all positions (remember we did 25k * 0.545).  If you can rank #1 for the term, you could expect to get 5,740 visitors (13,625 * 0.4213) per month from Google.  If you ranked #2, you could expect 1,621 visitors (13,625 * 0.119) per month from Google.  All you have to do is multiply the total expected number of clicks by the fraction of clicks a certain position gets.  So ranking #10 should get you about 407 visitors (13,625 * 0.0299) per month from Google.  Of course if you really wanted to do a thorough analysis of the domain&#8217;s potential you would add in search volume for long tail terms that you could likely rank for.  An example would be if you had CarInsurance.com, you might want to analyze other keywords such as &#8220;car insurance quotes&#8221; that you would likely be able to rank for.</p>
<p>If you have time, I would be interested to hear from the community about this.  If you have a site ranking on the first page of Google, run the numbers based on your position and the exact match search volume, then check your analytics and see how it compares to the real-world numbers.</p>
<p>Of course this leads to other questions such as how difficult it would be to rank for each position based on the competition, how much money you could expect to earn from PPC ads or affiliate programs based on the traffic you are expecting (and CTR/RPC), etc. but I will leave that for another discussion.  The first question is very tricky to come up with a guesstimate for, so I like to choose the position for the calculations conservatively.  There are many variables involved, most of which are a closely guarded trade secret.  You can make an educated guess by looking at the sites ranking on the first page.  How many backlinks do they have?  What is their page rank?  How long has the site been up?  How many established players are there (Wikipedia, Fortune 500, etc)?  Are there any .edu or .gov sites (these are hard to outrank)?  The earnings question is easy to ballpark once you have a traffic estimate though.</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=DN%20Media%20Corporation&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2F&amp;linkname=Understanding%20Search%20Volume&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2Funderstanding-search-volume%2F"><img src="http://dnmedia.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dnmedia.com/understanding-search-volume/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparing Mini Site Providers</title>
		<link>http://dnmedia.com/comparing-mini-site-providers/</link>
		<comments>http://dnmedia.com/comparing-mini-site-providers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sumner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dnmedia.com/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just wanted to discuss Mike Cohen&#8217;s most recent post, where he &#8220;compares&#8221; mini site development services.  He claims DomainMassDevelopment.com has great on-site SEO, while all other providers offer &#8220;weak&#8221; SEO or have none at all.  I decided to take a look at every example site he posted to see how good he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to discuss Mike Cohen&#8217;s <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wannadevelop.com/reviews/domain-mass-development-services/" target="_blank">most recent post</a>, where he &#8220;compares&#8221; mini site development services.  He claims<span id="more-347"></span> DomainMassDevelopment.com has great on-site SEO, while all other providers offer &#8220;weak&#8221; SEO or have none at all.  I decided to take a look at every example site he posted to see how good he really is at SEO.  And for this test, I checked the exact match of the domain (e.g. for the domain PlasticSurgeonReviews.com I searched for &#8220;plastic surgeon reviews&#8221;), which is easier to rank for.  Let&#8217;s see the results:</p>
<p><strong>LandSurveyors.com</strong><br />
Google: 3<br />
Yahoo: Not in top 100<br />
Bing: Not in top 100<br />
AOL: 3</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Comment:</span> Ok, not too bad.  This has 14,800 exact searches per month and 974,000 competing pages, so it has some competition.  But that&#8217;s the first example posted which will obviously be the best, so let&#8217;s keep going.</p>
<p><strong>PlasticSurgeonReviews.com</strong><br />
Google: Not in top 100<br />
Yahoo: 7<br />
Bing: Not in top 100<br />
AOL: Not in top 100</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Comment:</span> Ranking well in Yahoo for a very long-tail term with only 480 exact searches per month and 178k competing pages, but nowhere to be found in the other search engines.</p>
<p><strong>NouveauArchitecturalStyles.com</strong><br />
Google: Not in top 100<br />
Yahoo: 33<br />
Bing: Not in top 100<br />
AOL: Not in top 100</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Comment:</span> This is about as long-tail and low competition as it gets&#8230; with search volume so low that Adwords doesn&#8217;t even have data on it, and 20,800 competing pages.  Being on the third page of Yahoo and nowhere in the other search engines isn&#8217;t very impressive.</p>
<p><strong>DubrovnikVacations.com</strong><br />
Google: 11<br />
Yahoo: 33<br />
Bing: 5<br />
AOL: 8</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Comment:</span> Decent work on this one, he didn&#8217;t launch it that long ago and it is ranking pretty well across the board.  But there&#8217;s only 170 exact searches per month and 47,600 competing pages, so it isn&#8217;t something that is hard to rank for.</p>
<p><strong>ParabolicSkis.com</strong><br />
Google: 15<br />
Yahoo: Not in top 100<br />
Bing: 4<br />
AOL: Not in top 100</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Comment:</span> Not exactly a high competition term with only 720 exact searches per month and 40,200 competing pages.  Not on the first page of Google, and nowhere to be found in Yahoo or AOL.</p>
<p><strong>BondRatings.com</strong><br />
Google: Not in top 100<br />
Yahoo: Not in top 100<br />
Bing: Not in top 100<br />
AOL: Not in top 100</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Comment:</span> Seems like the search engines dislike this one across the board, even for the exact match.  This one has more competition, with an exact search volume of 4,400 and 247,000 competing pages.  Mike says his sites have the most content of all providers and that search engines love them, but I guess in some cases more isn&#8217;t always more.</p>
<p><strong>GovernmentCareers.com</strong><br />
Google: Not in top 100<br />
Yahoo: Not in top 100<br />
Bing: Not in top 100<br />
AOL: Not in top 100</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Comment:</span> Same deal as the one before, a little competition and the site can&#8217;t crack page 10 on any major search engine.  8,100 exact searches per month and 250,000 competing pages.</p>
<p><strong>EasternCaribbean.com</strong><br />
Google: Not in top 100<br />
Yahoo: 47<br />
Bing: Not in top 100<br />
AOL: Not in top 100</p>
<p><strong>Comment:</strong> Another decent domain, but it doesn&#8217;t stand up to even moderate competition.  This term has 2,400 exact searches per month and 1,350,000 competing pages.  This one is on the fourth page of Yahoo, and nowhere to be found in other search engines.  Not the results you would expect from an SEO expert.</p>
<hr />Now let&#8217;s take a look at a few MiniSites.com sites&#8230; based on Mike&#8217;s comments about our &#8220;weak&#8221; SEO compared to his skills, you would expect to not find any of our sites anywhere in the search engines, especially for terms that are much, much more competitive than the examples above. Well, let&#8217;s take a look:</p>
<p><strong>Beachwear.com</strong><br />
Google: 10<br />
Yahoo: 8<br />
Bing: Not in top 100<br />
AOL: 7</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Comment:</span> 33,100 exact searches per month and 2,450,000 competing pages.  Much more competitive than any of Mike&#8217;s keywords, yet it ranks well despite our supposedly weak on-site SEO.</p>
<p><strong>Motorsports.com</strong><br />
Google: 6<br />
Yahoo: 1<br />
Bing: 2<br />
AOL: 2</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Comment:</span> There are 90,500 exact searches per month for this term, with 14,700,000 competing pages.  That is major competition but the site we made stands among the best sites on the internet for the term in the eyes of the search engines.</p>
<p><strong>Housekeeper.com</strong><br />
Google: 5<br />
Yahoo: Not in top 100<br />
Bing: 3<br />
AOL: 4</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Comment:</span> 22,200 exact searches per month and 6,340,000 competing pages, yet 3 out of 4 of the top search engines deem our efforts good enough for strong placement on their first page of results.</p>
<p><strong>Sitter.com</strong><br />
Google: 5<br />
Yahoo: 3<br />
Bing: 4<br />
AOL: 4</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Comment:</span> All four major search engines think this is worthy of the above-the-fold, front page placement even though our SEO, according to Mike, leaves much to be desired.  Odd, isn&#8217;t it?  There are 8,100 exact searches and 20,500,000 competing pages, and the search engines see the site we made as being among the best.</p>
<p>I could go on all day with examples such as Wrenches.com, Bifocal.com, Bicycle.com, PetSitter.com, PaternityTest.com, MagicShops.com, etc., but I think it is pretty obvious that Mike Cohen is not the SEO expert he claims to be.  His example sites, which he rarely shows to anyone without an email request being sent to him, are almost all failing in the search engines while he claims to be the best at SEO among all the mini site providers.</p>
<p>He also claims to have the best designs available, and said &#8220;That is why we offer 100% customization and none of the website&#8217;s we deploy will  ever have the same exact look.&#8221;  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wannadevelop.com/reviews/domain-mass-development-services/" target="_blank">Look for yourself</a>&#8230; seven of his eight example sites use the<strong> exact same theme</strong>, all of which are barely modified.  How does he make a comment like that in the same post where he showcases a bunch of examples that <strong>all</strong> look the same? He must think we&#8217;re obtuse.</p>
<p>It is easy to see why his prices are so low with the quality of product he puts out. But would you rather pay $99 for a generic design that doesn&#8217;t stand up to the competition in the search engines, or $225 for a nice looking site that will get love from the search engines?  That&#8217;s a pretty easy decision if you actually believe in your domain enough to make a real investment in it.</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=DN%20Media%20Corporation&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2F&amp;linkname=Comparing%20Mini%20Site%20Providers&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2Fcomparing-mini-site-providers%2F"><img src="http://dnmedia.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dnmedia.com/comparing-mini-site-providers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Letter to the &#8220;King&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://dnmedia.com/open-letter-to-the-king/</link>
		<comments>http://dnmedia.com/open-letter-to-the-king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 00:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sumner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dnmedia.com/?p=329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, since my comment hasn&#8217;t made it through the moderation queue on Rick&#8217;s latest blog post about mini sites, and it seems like it isn&#8217;t going to make it through because many comments have been approved after mine, I guess I need to post it here.  It all started with Rick getting his Adsense account [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since my comment hasn&#8217;t made it through the moderation queue on Rick&#8217;s <a href="http://www.ricksblog.com/my_weblog/2009/09/interesting-questions-are-minisites-dead-how-does-g-really-view-domainers-and-the-industry-.html" target="_blank">latest blog post about mini sites</a>, and it<span id="more-329"></span> seems like it isn&#8217;t going to make it through because many comments have been approved after mine, I guess I need to post it here.  It all started with Rick getting his <a href="http://www.ricksblog.com/my_weblog/2009/09/google-adsense-closes-up-all-my-sites-and-minisites-no-notice-beware.html" target="_blank">Adsense account closed</a>, which he attributes (imo mistakenly) to having Adsense on mini sites.  He goes on in his most recent article to say that his mini sites showed no sign of life or growth.  Rick says &#8220;In EVERY case, traffic did not grow. In EVERY case traffic remained the same at BEST and mostly declined. In EVERY case I made less money than PPC.&#8221;  I guess they weren&#8217;t developed very well&#8230;</p>
<p>Several people then chimed in with comments saying mini sites are nothing but glorified MFA sites, that full-scale development is the only way to go, and so on.  As most of you know, I co-founded MiniSites.com.  I replied to his post with examples of our own development projects since Rick keeps saying how much he loves stats and numbers, and that everything else is BS.  Neither of my comments made it through though.</p>
<p>I occasionally hear people say that a mini site won&#8217;t get love from the search engines because they are too thin, but it is clear that those bemoaning the poor performance of mini sites obviously don&#8217;t know how to pull them off, or they used a provider that cuts corners and doesn&#8217;t do a good job.  Here are some examples of sites we developed along with their ranking in Google, exact monthly search frequency, and number of competing pages.  As you will see these are high-competition terms:</p>
<ul>
<li>Motorsports.com (#3 &#8211; 27,100 &#8211; 15.2 million)</li>
<li>Housekeeper.com (#4 &#8211; 22,200 &#8211; 6.47 million)</li>
<li>Sitter.com (#5 &#8211; 8,100 &#8211; 20.8 million)</li>
<li>Wrenches.com (#5 &#8211; 22,200 &#8211; 3.36 million)</li>
<li>Bifocal.com (#6 &#8211; 6,600 &#8211; 1.1 million)</li>
<li>RestlessLegSyndrome.com (#9 &#8211; 60,500 &#8211; 746,000)</li>
<li>Bicycle.com (#11 &#8211; 550,000 &#8211; 42.5 million)</li>
<li>Haberdashery.com (#6 &#8211; 33,100 &#8211; 892,000)</li>
<li>PetSitter.com (#6 &#8211; 9,900 &#8211; 1.95 million)</li>
<li>PaternityTest.com (#9 &#8211; 22,200 &#8211; 1.85 million)</li>
<li>BabysitterJobs.com (#9 &#8211; 18,100 &#8211; 3.53 million)</li>
<li>MagicShops.com (#7 &#8211; 6,600 &#8211; 63.4 million)</li>
<li>DesignerEyewear.com (#5 &#8211; 5,400 &#8211; 2.95 million)</li>
</ul>
<p>Do you REALLY think that Google would rank these high-competition terms on their first page if they thought they were too thin and useless?  Get a clue.  You think those rankings are impressive?  You should see what happens with long-tails that have low competition&#8230; the search engines love them so much it would blow your mind.</p>
<p>I hear people complaining that mini sites are too expensive&#8230; well you get what you pay for and then some.  I know people who have paid $10k+ for consulting from an SEO expert and usually don&#8217;t even get first page results&#8230; well the people above paid $350 for first page results and a solid web site to get them started.</p>
<p>The problem is that 95% of domainers have never done serious development and have no clue what it costs, and they all expect instant gratification.  I&#8217;ve seen people pay $5k for a good site design, $500 for a good logo, $10k+ for SEO services, mid $xx,xxx for a custom backend, etc.  $350 is dirt cheap for the results you get.  Many of our clients are getting thousands of uniques from search engines a month on domains that had never even been in the index before.  If you know how to turn those extra visitors into dollars through direct banner sales, affiliate programs, and lead gen, you&#8217;ll make that $350 back in a month with interest.  In fact, I&#8217;ll go into some traffic stats for you.</p>
<p>So far we&#8217;ve developed a little more than 200 sites, most of which are not in the same league as the category-killers listed above.  Across that network of sites in August, there were 100,046 uniques, 164,813 visitors, and 320,666 page views.  That&#8217;s not bad for a handful of &#8220;useless&#8221; mini sites.  Averaging 500 uniques per month, 65% return rate, and 1,600 page views per site is a sign of the quality we put out there.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s compare that to DevHub who just recently boasted hitting 1.1 million total visitors in 6 months with more than 25,000 active members.  Even if we assume that each active member has just one domain in their account (most likely more), they got an average of 44 visitors (1.1M / 25k) per site over that six month period.  In five months, we got 470,656 visitors, which across 200 sites is 2,352 visitors per site on average.</p>
<p>So are mini sites dead?  Well, I guess that would depend on what provider you&#8217;re using&#8230; Google seems to like our work by rewarding it with great rankings.  Other people who mass develop sites and cut costs and corners might be a dying breed, but doing things right will never go out of style.  We provide unique, relevant content which Google loves, solid designs, and we give you the ability to expand on our creation, adding pages, forums, etc. to make the site even more sticky.</p>
<p>We have clients with 60-75 mini sites on the same Adsense account and have never had a problem.  I&#8217;m guessing Rick was using AEIOU which didn&#8217;t used to put a Privacy Policy (against TOS), and is very spammy with their Adsense placement, and that&#8217;s why he got the boot.  Only Adsense knows for sure though.</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=DN%20Media%20Corporation&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2F&amp;linkname=Open%20Letter%20to%20the%20%26%238220%3BKing%26%238221%3B&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2Fopen-letter-to-the-king%2F"><img src="http://dnmedia.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dnmedia.com/open-letter-to-the-king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PushToAuction.com Goes Social</title>
		<link>http://dnmedia.com/pushtoauctioncom-goes-social/</link>
		<comments>http://dnmedia.com/pushtoauctioncom-goes-social/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sumner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Investing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dnmedia.com/?p=321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an effort to boost exposure for your Sedo listings even more, we&#8217;re trying a little experiment with PushToAuction.com.  A lot goes on at PushToAuction.com, to date it has helped sell almost a quarter of a million dollars in domains over almost 700 Sedo auctions.  Many of these domains would have sat on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an effort to boost exposure for your Sedo listings even more, we&#8217;re trying a little<span id="more-321"></span> experiment with <a title="Push to Auction" href="http://pushtoauction.com" target="_blank">PushToAuction.com</a>.  A lot goes on at <a href="http://pushtoauction.com" target="_blank">PushToAuction.com</a>, to date it has helped sell almost a quarter of a million dollars in domains over almost 700 Sedo auctions.  Many of these domains would have sat on the Sedo platform for months before receiving an offer (if ever), so we are providing a great deal of liquidity to sellers and giving buyers a chance to pick up solid domains at fair market value.  The top sale so far was WAE.com, which started at $60 and closed at $8,598.</p>
<p>So what is this experiment?  We&#8217;ll be posting on our new <a href="http://twitter.com/pushtoauction" target="_blank">Twitter account</a> every single time something happens on the site.  If a new listing is approved, it gets posted to Twitter with a link to the Sedo listing, encouraging our followers (and those viewing the public timeline) to make a $60 offer if they are interested in the domain.  If a domain gets pushed to auction, it gets posted to Twitter with a link to the Sedo auction, telling our followers to go join in the bidding.  When an auction closes, we post the sale price to Twitter with a link to the bidding history.</p>
<p>Our hope is that, first and foremost, this will help drive more traffic to Sedo listings, getting domains pushed to auction faster and bid up higher.  By making it easier for people to track activity on the site, there should hopefully be more involvement.  Also, as we grow our follower base, we will be able to hit a broader audience, some may even not be involved in the domain industry.  This will help educate outsiders on the value of domains, and make them aware of the existence of the domain aftermarket.</p>
<p>We just launched this test today.  The first Tweet on the new account was to notify followers that 9es.com was pushed to auction, and the Tweet got 14 clicks within a few seconds and we didn&#8217;t even have any followers yet.  The idea has already sent hundreds of clicks to Sedo listings, and it hasn&#8217;t even been 12 hours since we created the account.  This definitely looks promising, I expect this to take off once we have a larger follower base.</p>
<p>Please take a moment to <a href="http://twitter.com/pushtoauction" target="_blank">follow PushToAuction on Twitter</a>, maybe do a Tweet to tell your followers about us, and be sure to tell your domainer friends to give us a follow.  The more you help build awareness of the site, the more you will benefit when you need to liquidate one of your domains or you are looking to buy something.  Thanks!</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=DN%20Media%20Corporation&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2F&amp;linkname=PushToAuction.com%20Goes%20Social&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2Fpushtoauctioncom-goes-social%2F"><img src="http://dnmedia.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dnmedia.com/pushtoauctioncom-goes-social/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AWStats for All Domains</title>
		<link>http://dnmedia.com/awstats-combine-all-domains/</link>
		<comments>http://dnmedia.com/awstats-combine-all-domains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sumner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dnmedia.com/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across a limitation of AWStats today that, much to my surprise, has not really been addressed effectively.  For those of you that have cPanel and AWStats installed on your server, and host multiple domains on the same box, you may have noticed this too.  The way you normally see your AWStats is to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across a limitation of AWStats today that, much to my surprise, has not really been addressed effectively.  For those of<span id="more-307"></span> you that have cPanel and AWStats installed on your server, and host multiple domains on the same box, you may have noticed this too.  The way you normally see your AWStats is to log into cPanel, click on AWStats, and then it brings you to a list of all the domains you host on that server.  You then click on a single domain to view the traffic stats.</p>
<p>However, if you want to quickly get a glimpse of the traffic across your entire network of sites (maybe to give to prospective advertisers or investors), your only option is to click on each domain individually and create a spreadsheet.  There is one script I found called <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.telartis.nl/xcms/awstats" target="_blank">AWStats Totals</a>, but it seems to assume your AWStats directory is in a public_html (or www) folder that can be viewed directly.  In most cases, AWStats is installed in a directory below that, and you can only access the logs from cPanel.  Also, it seems insanely hard to configure.</p>
<p>So after searching for the better part of an hour to find a script that would work for my hosting configuration, I decided it would be quicker to just write one myself.  You start out by selecting a month and a year.  It then logs into your cPanel to get a list of all &#8220;addon domains&#8221;, then logs in to the stats pages one at a time, collects the information, and then displays it on the screen with totals at the bottom.  I&#8217;m not sure how many setups this will work on, but you should be fine if you have cPanel on the x3 theme, and a current version of AWStats.</p>
<p>Configuration is very simple, just enter your cPanel username and password, and your primary domain name, and you&#8217;re good to go.</p>
<p>Hope this helps someone&#8230;</p>
<p><a title="AWStats script combine stats multiple domains" href="http://dnmedia.com/awstats-combined.php" target="_blank">PHP script to view stats for all domains combined in AWStats</a>.</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=DN%20Media%20Corporation&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2F&amp;linkname=AWStats%20for%20All%20Domains&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2Fawstats-combine-all-domains%2F"><img src="http://dnmedia.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dnmedia.com/awstats-combine-all-domains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mini Sites are Thriving</title>
		<link>http://dnmedia.com/mini-sites-are-thriving/</link>
		<comments>http://dnmedia.com/mini-sites-are-thriving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sumner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dnmedia.com/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to hand it to Rick, he is great a putting a spin on something and making it seem new.  In the case of AEIOU v2 though, it was something that had to be done.  Every time he called his product a mini site, he was just helping to strengthen our brand.  One of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to hand it to Rick, he is great a putting a spin on something and making it seem new.  In the case of AEIOU v2 though<span id="more-272"></span>, it was something that had to be done.  Every time he called his product a mini site, he was just helping to strengthen our brand.  One of the few mistakes I&#8217;ve ever seen Rick make is not buying <a title="Mini Site Development" href="http://minisites.com/?refid=2684" target="_blank">MiniSites.com</a> when he had the chance.  When he first announced the launch of AEIOU on his blog, he even had a comment suggesting that he buy MiniSites.com from BuyDomains, but he didn&#8217;t pull the trigger.  Now it is time for damage control, because we saw the opportunity and seized it.</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s take a look at the &#8220;new&#8221; product lineup at AEIOU v2:</p>
<p><strong>The Squeeze Page</strong></p>
<p>This is just a new name for the old &#8220;1 Pager&#8221;.  Nothing has really changed, still a 1 page mini site with a simple contact form.  Squeeze pages have been used in affiliate marketing and lead gen for many years.  This is the same as our Micro site.</p>
<p><strong>The Info Site</strong></p>
<p>This is just a new name for their &#8220;Rapid Mini Site&#8221;.  It is still just a 5 page mini site with too much Adsense plastered on.  No new monetization methods here.  This is similar to our Mini site, and we even let you use affiliate programs, lead gen, direct banner sales through Google Ad Manager or OpenX, and more at no extra charge.</p>
<p><strong>The eBay eCommerce</strong></p>
<p>This is just a 1 page mini site.  Then everything under the Browse category are just subpages in WordPress with eBay affiliate code pasted in.  This is eerily reminiscent of the BANS product that, ironically enough, got banned from Google on a massive scale for being too thin and having too many ads.  Nothing ground-breaking here, you can save yourself a few hundred bucks by buying a one page site and then setting up the rest yourself, you don&#8217;t even need to know any code.  I wouldn&#8217;t recommend doing this on a site with only one page of content as they are selling it though, it is too thin and won&#8217;t get love from the search engines.</p>
<p><strong>The Amazon eCommerce</strong></p>
<p>Same deal as the eBay one, except this one has five pages of content with Amazon affiliate code pasted in.  Then several subcategories that also just have affiliate code pasted in.  Again, save yourself a hundred bucks by ordering a five page site, then just sign up for the <a href="https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/gp/associates/astore/main.html" target="_blank">Amazon aStore</a> and paste the code in yourself.  You don&#8217;t need any programming skills whatsoever, just a few minutes to cut and paste code for each of the categories and subcategories.  Amazon handles the shopping cart for you and checkout is handled through their site.</p>
<p>The <strong>Geo Site</strong> is just a mini site with scripts and WordPress plugins installed.  They are fairly well integrated, but again, nothing new or extraordinary.  You can sign up for the <a href="http://hotelscombined.com/Affiliates.aspx" target="_blank">HotelsCombined.com travel affiliate program</a> to get that nifty search box.  You would be better off using Orbitz or Expedia affiliate programs so you can capture airfare, hotels, and car rentals instead of just the hotel though.  The small details can make a huge impact on your revenue.</p>
<p>For the <strong>Directory Site</strong>, prepare to have your wallet emptied.  You can buy the <a href="https://www.phpmydirectory.com/order/cart.php" target="_blank">phpMyDirectory script</a> for about $100 ($50 for each extra license), and then just have someone skin it for you.  So of the $549 you pay for an empty directory, $500 of that is going towards design.  Want some content filled in for you?  The minimum is 10 categories with 10 listings each, that as a package will set you back $850.  Ouch&#8230; that is going to take a long time to get a return on that investment.</p>
<p>I applaud Rick for finally noticing that he was helping us by continuing to call his products mini sites, but to say mini sites are dead just because he needed to change the name is laughable.  Domainers are finally recognizing the need to develop sites on their domains to break free of the dying parking industry, and that ideal isn&#8217;t going anywhere, it is only getting stronger.  AEIOU v2 still makes mini sites, anyone who has taken on a full-scale development project will tell you the same&#8230; the name has just been changed.</p>
<p>A mini site is and always will be the middle ground between a free parked page and full-scale development which costs thousands of dollars.</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=DN%20Media%20Corporation&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2F&amp;linkname=Mini%20Sites%20are%20Thriving&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2Fmini-sites-are-thriving%2F"><img src="http://dnmedia.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dnmedia.com/mini-sites-are-thriving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MiniSites.com Expands</title>
		<link>http://dnmedia.com/minisitescom-expands/</link>
		<comments>http://dnmedia.com/minisitescom-expands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sumner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dnmedia.com/?p=257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
MiniSites.com is proud to announce several exciting new offerings to help you grow your business.  The first addition is subscription-based services.  Our mini sites often rank very well in search engines within a few weeks of being launched.  However, improving and solidifying your site&#8217;s position in the SERPs (Search Engine Results Page) is an ongoing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://minisites.com/?refid=2684" target="_blank"><img src="http://affiliates.minisites.com/materials/468x60.gif" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><a title="Mini Site Development" href="http://minisites.com/?refid=2684" target="_blank">MiniSites.com</a> is proud to announce several exciting new offerings to help you grow your business.  The first addition is<span id="more-257"></span> <a title="Mini Site Subscription Servic" href="http://minisites.com/subscriptions/?refid=2684" target="_blank">subscription-based services</a>.  Our <a title="Mini Sites" href="http://minisites.com/?refid=2684" target="_blank">mini sites</a> often rank very well in search engines within a few weeks of being launched.  However, improving and solidifying your site&#8217;s position in the SERPs (Search Engine Results Page) is an ongoing process that requires updates to your content and securing additional, quality backlinks.  In recognition of this fact, we now offer content writing and linkbuilding services that can be purchased on a monthly basis at affordable prices.  If you purchase several months in advance, or order the service as a combo deal, you enjoy deep discounts.  This makes it easy to ensure that your site performs at its maximum earning potential.</p>
<p>The second addition to our offering is up to five free email forwarding accounts.  At <a title="Mini Sites" href="http://minisites.com/?refid=2684" target="_blank">MiniSites.com</a> we truly believe a good mini site should be cultivated into an online business, not just thrown up and forgotten about.  We help our clients position themselves as an authority in their niche, allowing them to expand their business by offering direct banner sales, selling products on their <a title="Mini Sites" href="http://minisites.com/?refid=2684" target="_blank">mini sites</a>, and more.  However, unlike other mini site developers, we help you take your professionalism to the next level by offering branded email addresses for each domain name.  Instead of doing business on Example.com from a Gmail account, you can now do it from yourname@example.com, sales@example.com, admin@example.com, or whatever email address you like.  This gives our customers an unparalleled level of credibility.</p>
<p>The final improvement to MiniSites.com is the addition of an <a title="mini site affiliate program" href="http://affiliates.minisites.com/" target="_blank">affiliate program</a>.  In the few months since we launched, we have enjoyed a tremendous amount of success.  We positioned ourselves to be the leader in <a title="Mini Site Development" href="http://minisites.com/?refid=2684" target="_blank">mini site development</a> both through the acquisition of the category-defining domain name, but also through our superior product offering.  We want to share our success with those in the industry who will help us promote our services.  If you have a website or blog that attracts visitors interested in domaining, developing, affiliate marketing, or making money online, you should seriously consider <a title="mini site affiliate program" href="http://affiliates.minisites.com/" target="_blank">joining the affiliate program</a>.  We offer 10% on each sale, paid twice a month, and our average sale price is more than $2,600.</p>
<p>We are very excited about these changes, and hope the domaining community is as well!</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=DN%20Media%20Corporation&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2F&amp;linkname=MiniSites.com%20Expands&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdnmedia.com%2Fminisitescom-expands%2F"><img src="http://dnmedia.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dnmedia.com/minisitescom-expands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

